Resumen
Cloud-native BIM platforms offer embedded environmental analysis capabilities that remain underexplored in architectural education. This exploratory case study documents the use of Autodesk Forma Site Design as a pedagogical tool for early-stage bioclimatic analysis. Nineteen undergraduate architecture students at Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey Campus, analyzed a real residential subdivision provided by an industry partner during two five-hour in-person sessions. Four teams simultaneously populated a shared cloud model using Revit mass imports and native Forma tools, and then performed solar-hours, wind, glare-potential, and shadow analyses in their assigned zones. Each team developed a comparative prototype matrix or synthesis and justified the selection of a recommended housing prototype based on environmental criteria derived from its analyses. Individual reflections were also qualitatively coded to identify evidence of perceived learning, data-grounded environmental reasoning, multi-criteria synthesis, and collaboration. The results suggest that students were able to translate environmental simulations into multi-criteria bioclimatic arguments despite limited prior exposure to the platform. The reflections indicated perceived conceptual shifts regarding orientation, passive design, and the use of environmental data in design decision-making. Autodesk Forma Site Design appears to be a viable pedagogical tool for collaborative environmental analysis in undergraduate architectural education, although the findings should be interpreted within the limits of an exploratory case study with a small sample size.
Citas
Altan, H., Hajibandeh, M., Tabet Aoul, K. A., & Deep, A. (2016). Passive design. In Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering (pp. 209–236). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31967-4_8
Basson, J.-P., & Smallwood, J. (2026). A seven-step BIM collaboration model for AEC education: Bridging disciplinary silos through BIM maturity level 3 implementation. Buildings, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16071282
Bernett, A., Kral, K., & Dogan, T. (2021). Sustainability evaluation for early design (SEED) framework for energy use, embodied carbon, cost, and daylighting assessment. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 14(2), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2020.1865459
Chelaru, B., Onuțu, C., Ungureanu, G., Volf, I., & Șerbănoiu, A. A. (2025). BIM and cloud-based tools integration for BREEAM in energy-efficient building design: A case study. Results in Engineering, 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105493
Chenah, D. E., & Boton, C. (2026). Teaching collaborative BIM in higher education: A new pedagogical framework. Journal of Civil Engineering Education, 152(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEECD.EIENG-2356
Cillari, G., Fantozzi, F., & Franco, A. (2021). Passive solar solutions for buildings: Criteria and guidelines for a synergistic design. Applied Sciences, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010376
Daniel, & Sood, M. (2025). AI in architecture: Validating Autodesk Forma for climate-responsive building design. In Proceedings of the 2025 12th International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom 2025). https://doi.org/10.23919/INDIACom66777.2025.11115700
Hemmerling, M., & Maris, S. (2020). INTERCOM: A platform for collaborative design processes. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (Vol. 2, pp. 173–180).
Herrera, R. F., Vielma, J. C., & Muñoz, F. C. (2018). BIM and teamwork of civil engineering students: A case study. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 20(3), 230–235.
Li, L., & Hong, F. (2020). Energy simulation and integration at the early stage of architectural design. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 19(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2019.1696806
Mashruwala, P., & Jadav, P. (2023). Impact of passive design techniques on building performance in improving thermal comfort in a hot and dry climatic zone. In Future is Urban: Livability, Resilience and Resource Conservation – Proceedings of the International Conference on Future is Urban (pp. 320–330)
Nguyen, T. D., & Adhikari, S. (2025). Bridging the gap: Enhancing BIM education for sustainable design through integrated curriculum and student perception analysis. Computers, 14(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14110463
Quedas Campoy, C., Maria Rabelo Souza, A., Izidoro, C., & Emanuel Scanavino, R. (2025). Integración entre inteligencia artificial, diseño y enseñanza de arquitectura y urbanismo: El caso de Forma Autodesk. Sapiens International Multidisciplinary Journal, (2). Recuperado de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=10142119
Rizaoglu, I. K., & Voss, K. (2020). Building performance simulation to stimulate architectural early design: Integrating design and simulation. In PLEA 2020: 35th PLEA Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture Planning Post Carbon Cities, Proceedings (Vol. 3, pp. 1525–1530)
Shahverdi, A. F., Mostafavi, F., Roodkoly, S. H., Zomorodian, Z. S., & Homayouni, H. (2024). Developing a pedagogical framework for an integrated and BIM-based high-performance design studio: Experimental case study. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/JAEIED.AEENG-1550
Shen, Z., Jensen, W., Wentz, T., & Fischer, B. (2012). Teaching sustainable design using BIM and project-based energy simulations. Education Sciences, 2(3), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci2030136
Shen, Z., Jensen, W. G., Fischer, B. A., & Wentz, T. G. (2012). Using BIM to teach design and construction of sustainable buildings. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
Tecnológico de Monterrey. (2022). AR3002C: BIM Design and Management. Recuperado de https://samp.itesm.mx/Materias/VistaPreliminarMateria?clave=AR3002C&lang=EN

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2026 Juana Isabel Méndez Garduño

