AI governance: Hiroshima AI process compared to Honduran and Latin American advances

Abstract

Introduction. The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has reshaped industries and societies globally, necessitating robust governance frameworks to manage its development responsibly. Case presentation. This document compares the G7 Hiroshima AI Process and Chile’s National Policy on Artificial Intelligence, highlighting their distinct approaches and shared objectives. The Hiroshima AI Process, launched during the 2023 G7 Summit, emphasizes global collaboration, ethical guidelines, and a human-centric, risk-based framework. In contrast, Chile’s governance focuses on national priorities, featuring a ten-year action plan and legislation to integrate AI into its socio-economic fabric. Discussion. Both frameworks address transparency, accountability, and ethical considerations, albeit on different scales. While the Hiroshima AI Process sets a global standard for interoperability and shared governance, Chile’s efforts exemplify localized implementation with international collaboration. Conclusion. Together, these initiatives underscore the necessity of diverse strategies in navigating AI’s complexities effectively which in the future could serve as a base to the Honduran government for establishing or adopting existing measures for AI governance.